Abstract

Recent diarization technologies can be categorized into two approaches, i.e., clustering and end-to-end neural approaches, which have different pros and cons. The clustering-based approaches assign speaker labels to speech regions by clustering speaker embeddings such as x-vectors. While it can be seen as a current state-of-the-art approach that works for various challenging data with reasonable robustness and accuracy, it has a critical disadvantage that it cannot handle overlapped speech that is inevitable in natural conversational data. In contrast, the end-to-end neural diarization (EEND), which directly predicts diarization labels using a neural network, was devised to handle the overlapped speech. While the EEND, which can easily incorporate emerging deep-learning technologies, has started outperforming the x-vector clustering approach in some realistic database, it is difficult to make it work for `long' recordings (e.g., recordings longer than 10 minutes) because of, e.g., its

Authors

(none)

Tags

  • Uncategorized

Stats

Related papers