Abstract
Real-world speech communication is rarely affected by a single type of degradation. Instead, it suffers from a complex interplay of acoustic interference, codec compression, and, increasingly, secondary artifacts introduced by upstream enhancement algorithms. To bridge the gap between academic research and these realistic scenarios, we introduced the CCF AATC 2025 Challenge. This challenge targets universal blind speech restoration, requiring a single model to handle three distinct distortion categories: acoustic degradation, codec distortion, and secondary processing artifacts. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive retrospective of the challenge, detailing the dataset construction, task design, and a systematic analysis of the 25 participating systems. We report three key findings that define the current state of the field: (1) Efficiency vs. Scale: Contrary to the trend of massive generative models, top-performing systems demonstrated that lightweight discriminative architectures (<10M parameters) can achieve state-of-the-art performance, balancing restoration quality with deployment constraints. (2) Generative Trade-off: While generative and hybrid models excel in theoretical perceptual metrics, breakdown analysis reveals they suffer from "reconstruction bias" in high-SNR codec tasks and struggle with hallucination in complex secondary artifact scenarios. (3) Metric Gap: Most critically, our rank correlation analysis exposes a strong negative correlation (\r{ho}=-0.8) between widely-used reference-free metrics (e.g., DNSMOS) and human MOS when evaluating hybrid systems. This indicates that current metrics may over-reward artificial spectral smoothness at the expense of perceptual naturalness. This paper aims to serve as a reference for future research in robust speech restoration and calls for the development of next-generation evaluation metrics sensitive to generative artifacts.