Abstract
A financial AI agent can repeat a decision while changing the tools, order, or recorded arguments and results used to reach it. Outcome-only evaluation misses this variation, even when it matters for replay and change control. DFAH-Bench operationalizes the Determinism-Faithfulness Assurance Harness (DFAH), where faithfulness means fidelity of observable execution under replay, not answer correctness. The protocol qualifies comparable, sufficiently observed replays and measures decision agreement (DAR) and tool-path agreement (TAR) over the same eligible groups. We analyze 4,157 retrospective episodes from configurations with observed tool use across 719 synthetic compliance and financial DataOps groups, together with an argument-aware prospective extension comprising 570 eligible episodes across 190 groups. In that extension, decisions agree 94.2-95.1% while exact tool-name paths agree 66.9-69.4%, producing 25.8-27.3 percentage-point gaps; argument-and-result trajectory agreement falls to 45.0-51.5%. Even among unanimous-decision groups, paths vary in 66.7-68.9% under task weighting. DFAH-Bench makes the execution behind a stable decision visible for replay, investigation, and change review.