Utilizing Metadata For Better Retrieval-augmented Generation

Abstract

Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems depend on retrieving semantically relevant document chunks to support accurate, grounded outputs from large language models. In structured and repetitive corpora such as regulatory filings, chunk similarity alone often fails to distinguish between documents with overlapping language. Practitioners often flatten metadata into input text as a heuristic, but the impact and trade-offs of this practice remain poorly understood. We present a systematic study of metadata-aware retrieval strategies, comparing plain-text baselines with approaches that embed metadata directly. Our evaluation spans metadata-as-text (prefix and suffix), a dual-encoder unified embedding that fuses metadata and content in a single index, dual-encoder late-fusion retrieval, and metadata-aware query reformulation. Across multiple retrieval metrics and question types, we find that prefixing and unified embeddings consistently outperform plain-text baselines, with the unified at ti

Stats

• citations0
• S2 citations—
• github stars0
• HF likes0
• heat score0.00
• arxiv keyyousuf2026utilizing

Related papers

• Advancing Retrieval-augmented Generation For Structured Enterprise And Internal Data (2025)1.20
• Graph-aware Late Chunking For Retrieval-augmented Generation In Biomedical Literature (2026)0.00
• From BM25 To Corrective RAG: Benchmarking Retrieval Strategies For Text-and-table Documents (2026)0.00
• Are We On The Right Way For Assessing Document Retrieval-augmented Generation? (2025)0.00
• Optimizing Retrieval-augmented Generation: Analysis Of Hyperparameter Impact On Performance And Efficiency (2025)0.00
• Gear: Generation Augmented Retrieval (2025)2.79
• Chunk Twice, Embed Once: A Systematic Study Of Segmentation And Representation Trade-offs In Chemistry-aware Retrieval-augmented Generation (2025)0.00
• Llm-augmented Retrieval: Enhancing Retrieval Models Through Language Models And Doc-level Embedding (2024)0.00