Abstract

State-of-the-art reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms typically use random sampling (e.g., \(\epsilon\)-greedy) for exploration, but this method fails on hard exploration tasks like Montezuma's Revenge. To address the challenge of exploration, prior works incentivize exploration by rewarding the agent when it visits novel states. Such intrinsic rewards (also called exploration bonus or curiosity) often lead to excellent performance on hard exploration tasks. However, on easy exploration tasks, the agent gets distracted by intrinsic rewards and performs unnecessary exploration even when sufficient task (also called extrinsic) reward is available. Consequently, such an overly curious agent performs worse than an agent trained with only task reward. Such inconsistency in performance across tasks prevents the widespread use of intrinsic rewards with RL algorithms. We propose a principled constrained optimization procedure called Extrinsic-Intrinsic Policy Optimization (EIPO) that automat

Authors

(none)

Tags

  • Exploration

Stats

  • citations0
  • S2 citationsβ€”
  • github stars0
  • HF likes0
  • heat score0.00
  • arxiv keychen2022redeeming

Related papers