← all papers · overview

Strength of the nonlocality of two-qubit entangled state and its applications

Abstract

Non-locality is a feature of quantum mechanics that cannot be explained by local realistic theory. It can be detected by the violation of Bell's inequality. In this work, we have considered the evaluation of Bell's inequality with the help of the XOR game. In the XOR game, a two-qubit entangled state is shared between the two distant players. It may generate a non-local correlation between the players which contributes to the maximum probability of winning of the game. We have aimed to determine the strength of the non-locality through XOR game. Thus, we have defined a quantity S_NL called the strength of non-locality, purely on the basis of the maximum probability of winning of the XOR game. We have also derived the relation between the introduced quantity S_NL and the quantity M introduced in \cite{horo3}, to study the non-locality of a two-qubit entangled state problem in depth. The quantity M may be defined as the sum of the two largest eigenvalues of the correlation matrix of the given entangled state and it determines whether the given entangled state under probe is non-local. Further, we have explored the non-locality of any two-qubit entangled state, whose non-locality cannot be detected by the CHSH inequality. Interestingly, we have found that the newly defined quantity S_NL fails to detect non-locality for the entangled state, when the witness operator corresponding to CHSH operator cannot detect the entangled state. To overcome this problem, we have modified the definition of the strength of non-locality and have shown that the modified definition may detect the non-locality of such entangled states, which were earlier undetected by S_NL. Furthermore, we have also provided two applications of the strength S_NL of the non-locality in controlled quantum teleportation and linkage of non-locality of three qubit state to two-qubit state.

Related papers

Ranked by semantic similarity — how closely each paper's abstract matches this one (100% = near-identical topic).