Abstract
Brukner and Pienaar have critiqued the Relational Quantum Mechanics of Rovelli, and together with Di Biagio, the latter has replied. I point out a few places where, in my view, that reply needs clarification.
Is Relational Quantum Mechanics about Facts? If So, Whose? A Reply to Di Biagio and Rovelli's Comment on Brukner and Pienaar
Related papers
Ranked by semantic similarity — how closely each paper's abstract matches this one (100% = near-identical topic).
- Relational Quantum Mechanics is about Facts, not States: A reply to Pienaar and Brukner (2021)78% match
- Assessing Relational Quantum Mechanics (2021)71% match
- Relative facts do not exist. Relational Quantum Mechanics is Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics. Response to the critique by Aurélien Drezet (2022)71% match
- Open Problems in Relational Quantum Mechanics (2017)71% match
- Relational Quantum Mechanics is Still Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics (2023)70% match
- Information is Physical: Cross-Perspective Links in Relational Quantum Mechanics (2022)70% match
- Relational Quantum Dynamics (RQD): An Informational Ontology (2024)70% match
- The Relational Interpretation of Quantum Physics (2021)69% match