Abstract
Abstract Modern web application development has been shaped profoundly by the evolution of rendering strategies. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative study of Server-Side Rendering (SSR) and Client-Side Rendering (CSR) as implemented in the React and Next.js ecosystems. The research benchmarks both approaches across three critical dimensions: application performance (measured via Core Web Vitals including Largest Contentful Paint, First Input Delay, and Cumulative Layout Shift), Search Engine Optimization (SEO) effectiveness, and developer experience. Through controlled experiments, literature review, and analysis of real-world case studies, we demonstrate that SSR consistently outperforms CSR for content-heavy, SEO-critical applications, while CSR excels in highly interactive, single-page application scenarios. Next.js emerges as a compelling full-stack framework that bridges this gap by offering hybrid rendering capabilities including Static Site Generation (SSG) and Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR). Our findings provide actionable guidelines for web development practitioners and architects when choosing a rendering strategy for their specific use case. Keywords: Server-Side Rendering, Client-Side Rendering, React, Next.js, Core Web Vitals, SEO, Static Site Generation, Web Performance, Developer Experience, Hydration Previous Deepfake Media Detection Framework Using Machine Learning with Multimodal Feature Extraction for Real and Synthetic Content