← all papers · overview

Paper2Rebuttal: A Multi-Agent Framework for Transparent Author Response Assistance

Abstract

Writing effective rebuttals is a high-stakes task that demands more than linguistic fluency, as it requires precise alignment between reviewer intent and manuscript details. Current solutions typically treat this as a direct-to-text generation problem, suffering from hallucination, overlooked critiques, and a lack of verifiable grounding. To address these limitations, we introduce RebuttalAgent\textbf{RebuttalAgent}, the first multi-agents framework that reframes rebuttal generation as an evidence-centric planning task. Our system decomposes complex feedback into atomic concerns and dynamically constructs hybrid contexts by synthesizing compressed summaries with high-fidelity text while integrating an autonomous and on-demand external search module to resolve concerns requiring outside literature. By generating an inspectable response plan before drafting, RebuttalAgent\textbf{RebuttalAgent} ensures that every argument is explicitly anchored in internal or external evidence. We validate our approach on the proposed RebuttalBench\textbf{RebuttalBench} and demonstrate that our pipeline outperforms strong baselines in coverage, faithfulness, and strategic coherence, offering a transparent and controllable assistant for the peer review process. Code will be released.

Related papers

Ranked by semantic similarity — how closely each paper's abstract matches this one (100% = near-identical topic).