← all papers · overview

The Realhumaneval: Evaluating Large Language Models' Abilities To Support Programmers

Abstract

Evaluation of large language models for code has primarily relied on static benchmarks, including HumanEval (Chen et al., 2021), or more recently using human preferences of LLM responses. As LLMs are increasingly used as programmer assistants, we study whether gains on existing benchmarks or more preferred LLM responses translate to programmer productivity when coding with LLMs, including time spe

Related papers

Ranked by semantic similarity — how closely each paper's abstract matches this one (100% = near-identical topic).