← all papers · overview

High Volatility And Action Bias Distinguish Llms From Humans In Group Coordination

Abstract

Humans exhibit remarkable abilities to coordinate in groups. As large language models (LLMs) become more capable, it remains an open question whether they can demonstrate comparable adaptive coordination and whether they use the same strategies as humans. To investigate this, we compare LLM and human performance on a common-interest game with imperfect monitoring: Group Binary Search. In this n-pl

Related papers

Ranked by semantic similarity — how closely each paper's abstract matches this one (100% = near-identical topic).